|
welcome! to feeling emotional, too!
after looking things over here at feeling emotional,
too, try out "the layer down under," (part of
the emotional feelings network of sites) & read a special "i just gotta say it" column concerning porn addiction by clicking here! Be sure to scroll down towards the bottom of the right hand column to find it!


How this site works best for you!
You'll
notice that there are many underlined link words in each article below. The reason for this is that you have reached not only, "feeling
emotional, too," but the emotional feelings network of sites. There are many sites
included within the network that'll be visited by clicking on these underlined link words.
If you can't find what you came
here looking for, visit the homepage for the emotional feelings network of sites by clicking above & read the options on
the homepage for the networks index of sites. Try to be specific when looking for an emotion or feeling word & click on the site you need!
It's very simple & very
interesting to follow your way thru the layers of your buried or stuffed emotions & feelings that have accumulated throughout the years!
when you've reached this point, or this website, you know you're making
progress!!!! this part gets difficult because now is the time to look within & become emotionally honest with yourself!!!
Best of luck & if you're
still stuck, send me an e-mail anytime, by clicking
here & I'll be glad to send you an immediate personal response!
Sincerely,
Kathleen




the bad apples Author:
Adam Khan
WHEN DALE CARNEGIE WROTE his classic book on human relations, How
to Win Friends and Influence People, he left out a chapter; it wasn’t finished on time, so the book was published
without it. The chapter was supposed to cover the subject of dealing with people you can't win with.
For most
people, when you treat them fairly, they treat you fairly
in return. But as you know, there exists in this world a small percentage of people who will simply take advantage of you
when you try to treat them fairly.
There
are people who'll play games with you, deceive you & some who will actively prevent you from making your relationship work.
Carnegie’s
unwritten chapter was for the times when “somebody has to go to jail, be spanked, divorced, knocked down, sued
in court.”
Even
beyond those extreme cases, every once in awhile you’ll get stuck working with or having to interact with someone
who continually brings you down or in some way makes your life difficult.

They
may seem to be very nice people. They might smile & come across with a lot of charm. But the end result of your interactions are: You’re worse off. You try to make things work,
you try to be fair & you get the short end of the stick every time.
You’ve
tried to talk with them, perhaps & it doesn’t make things better & they probably make you feel bad for saying anything.
I have
no fancy methods for dealing with these people. You can’t really deal with them. If they’re doing something
illegal, you can certainly call the police, but most are too clever to do something illegal.
My wife
uses a good analogy in her speeches. She says trying to make things work with these people is like trying to wrestle with
someone who is covered with mud:
You’re going to get muddy. No matter what you do or how well you do
it or how noble your intentions, you’ll get muddy.
So instead
of trying to make things work out with these people, the goal is to avoid dealing with them at all. Go for minimal impact. Have as little to do with them as you can get away with (without causing yourself trouble).
Ideally,
you'd eliminate them from your life completely. Stop calling, stop visiting, stop being nice. You
don’t have to be mean about it. Just fade them into the background & then all the way out of the picture.
I know
this isn’t a perfect world. Sometimes you’ll have to keep interacting with someone who won’t let
you make things work. So go as far as you can to minimize their effect on your life.
Talk
to them as little as you can, look at them as little as you can. Focus your attention on
your purpose & on the rest of the people around you.
When
you come across someone & nothing works w/him, cut your losses. Don’t waste any more effort trying. This
is a big world full of wonderful people & a few bad apples.
Concentrate
your attention on the good people & waste as little of your attention as you can on the ones
who bring you down.
You can
do it a little at a time & it'll improve your attitude. And if it improves your attitude, it’s good for your relationships with your family & friends & it’s good for
your health.
Try not to waste
too much of your attention on people who bother you.

Fairness is playing by the rules, taking
turns, sharing & listening to what others have to say. Fair
people don’t take advantage
of others. They consider all sides before they decide & they don't blame other people for something they didn't do.
What Parents Can Do To Promote Fairness:
- Children
become sensitive to issues of fairness very early, especially when they’re on the receiving end. Be sure to teach that fairness is as important when you’re giving as well as getting. Role playing (pretending) can be
very effective if you put your child on both sides of the situation.
- Be
mindful about treating children fairly & not showing
favorites.
- Encourage fairness by praising demonstrations of sharing & taking
turns & by using the words "you’re being very fair."
- Listening to your child is a matter of both fairness & respect. Model
good listening.
- Be very careful not to accuse or punish a child unfairly. Remember that a punishment that is too harsh for the unwanted
action will seem unfair to your child.



Getting Along with People: Building Healthy Relationships
Getting along
with people can be one of the toughest challenges on this planet. People are
unpredictable. Some
people even bite. Some of us can easily handle the stress from dealing with many people, but others of us may find it a cumbersome
challenge.
Here
is some advice on getting along with others:
Be friendly to all in all in your relationships with others. If you want to
be well liked by most people, you simply have to be friendly with all. Engaging in a continual effort to be friendly towards all in whatever situation & at whatever time will eventually win you much respect, but it does take time.
Even if people don't mention it directly to you, they'll sense that you are a comrade to all. This isn't to say you should fake your friendliness. Your sincerity should
be coming from within your soul.
Nor should you
be doing things that are against your conscience, but to act according to how you believe every one on this planet should be treated, which is equally, fairly
& sincerely.
Try your best & move on in all relationships.
Sometimes, no matter how hard you try, someone may still not like you. It
may, in fact, have nothing to do with you at all. It may simply be that that
other person has seen behaviors in you that have resembled some of the behavior he has seen in people in the past who turned
out to not be good.
For example, if you speak loudly & in the past he had a friend who also spoke
loudly, but later betrayed him, he may not like you no matter how hard you try to please him.
So, if you've
given your best shot, don't dwell on it. Move on.
If he doesn't want to be your friend or be supportive
of you, let it be.
Communicate assertively with other people. Generally, the assertive style type of behavior is most favored when dealing with people in your relationships.
In assertive behavior, you're neither aggressive nor passive. You speak how you feel, without the fear of not being able to speak what you want to, in a non-threatening way to others. This should also generate assertive behavior from the opposite side if done well.
Be Permissive: Let others have their way sometimes.
Of course, if you really believe in something, you should try to persuade them to your viewpoint.
However, if it's a minor issue, just let others have their way.
If they want to leave their container in the refrigerator & it's not really bothering you, you should just let
them have their way.
It's also good for your health to not rant about everything, but just to take it easy. Other people may even have a reason for doing what they did.
Become
an expert at implicit conversation. The people who most skillfully get things done are those who don't seem to have even
asked another person to have done it.
It just seems to be a natural extension of the conversation. Similarly,
it also requires skill to be able to worm your way out before you get attacked, criticized, or
disliked by others.
You must recognize when such occurrences will occur & be wary of them. By keeping alert for any possibility, you will be more prepared.



Life is Not Fair: And That Can Be Very Good For You
by Al Siebert, Ph.D.
With foreword by Bernie Siegel, M.D.
When you're hit by adversity or have your life disrupted, how do you respond?
Some people feel victimized. They blame
others for their plight. Some shut down. They feel helpless & overwhelmed. Some get angry. They lash out & try to hurt anyone they can.
A few, however, reach w/in
themselves & find ways to cope w/ the adversity. They eventually make things turn out well.
These are life's best survivors, those people w/ an amazing capacity for surviving crises & extreme difficulties.
They're resilient & durable
in distressing situations. They regain emotional balance quickly, adapt & cope
well. They thrive by gaining strength from adversity & often convert misfortune into a gift.
Are life's best survivors different from other people? No. They
survive, cope & thrive better because they're better at using the inborn abilities possessed by all humans.

Surviving & Thriving: Using Your Inborn
Abilities
If you're like most people, you haven't had good coaching on
how to cope well w/ adversity, crises & constant change. This book shows you how to access your inborn survivor qualities
& increase your range of responses for coping w/whatever comes your way.
This book shows how to:
- regain stability when your life
is knocked off track
- cope w/unfair developments
in an effective way
- increase your self-confidence
for handling disruptive changes
- break free from childhood prohibitions
that prevent many people from effective coping
- avoid reacting like a victim
- develop a talent for serendipity
- thrive in a world of non-stop change
The Invisible Minority
Making Sure Gay Workers Don’t Feel Stigmatized By
Bob Rosner, Allan Halcrow and Alan Levins
Jan. 8: Do your co-workers have pictures of their spouses & children on their desks?
Do people talk about their
weekend plans at the water cooler or in the elevator?
Does the company host social
events that include spouses?
Has anyone ever stopped by
your desk to collect money to send a gift to a newlywed colleague or the parents of a new baby?
If the answer to any of those questions
is "yes," then sexual orientation is an issue in your workplace.
That issue can be either a big positive
or a big negative. If it's a positive, people feel included
& respected. They're more productive & more committed.
If it's a negative,
people feel excluded & disrespected. They're less productive &
far more likely to quit & go work for your competitor. And they're more likely to file potentially costly harassment lawsuits.
Huh? How
did we get from baby gifts to turnover & lawsuits? Here's how: Your heterosexual employees take for granted that they
can comfortably share important elements
of their private lives at work. All those normal activities - from pictures to weekend plans - are reflections of that comfort. And that's as it should be.
In most work places, however, gay men, lesbians
& bisexuals don't feel comfortable sharing anything of their private lives.
Although they may have been w/ a partner
for years, they don't have any pictures on their desk. If they talk about weekend plans at all, they probably talk about "I"
but never "he" or "she" & probably not "we" because it invites too many questions. They probably attend social events
alone, or they come w/ a friend of the opposite sex.
In short, while their heterosexual colleagues
have one life, they have two lives: work life & personal life.
A Productivity Issue
OK, but how is this your problem & not
something for the U.N. Human Rights Commission to address? It starts as a productivity issue. Gay men, lesbians & bisexuals
still in the closet at work expend an enormous amount of psychic energy protecting their secret.
If you doubt it,
try this experiment:
Go an entire day without saying or doing
anything that reveals your sexuality. You'll see "don't ask, don't tell" in a whole new light: Odds are that you'll be exhausted at the end of the day. And you'll have devoted a lot of thought
& energy to protecting yourself that would have been better served solving a work problem.
So, if it's that much work to stay in the
closet, then why not just be honest? Many gay people are afraid to be honest & for good reason. Gay men, lesbians & bisexual know too many friends who've
been passed up for promotions or fired. Or worse.
They know people who've been called names,
robbed, beaten up & splashed w/ acid. Yes, at work. What started as a productivity issue has become much more.
People faced w/ quiet indignity
or violent hostility have 3 choices.
- They can put up with it
- They can fight back
- They can leave
Fewer gay men, lesbians & bisexuals put up with it. Many
take the issue to court. Others leave for jobs where they're accepted. Can you afford to fight a lawsuit or have good people walk out the door?
You may have religious beliefs that homosexuality is wrong,
or you may simply be uncomfortable w/ the idea. We're not asking you to change those beliefs. But
we are asking you to recognize that as a manager it's often your job to set aside personal feelings
& treat people fairly. That's good business sense.
Here's how to do it.
Take
Action
Look at your company policies. Most large organizations (& many smaller ones) have nondiscrimination policies. If yours is among them, does the policy
prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation?
If so, be sure you follow
the policy. If not, suggest to HR or senior management that the policy be expanded. A clear policy is an important
foundation for everything else you do.
Review your benefit plan. Most employer-sponsored health care plans offer dependent
coverage. Usually, however, dependents are defined strictly as spouses & children.
A growing number of companies, however, offer health coverage
to domestic partners as well. If your plan offers such coverage, be sure your employees know about it. (Tell everyone about the coverage - not just those you think may be gay, lesbian or bisexual). If not, advocate
to HR or senior management that such coverage be offered.
Having it offers a competitive advantage (Microsoft, IBM & General Motors are among the many companies that now offer the benefits.) And it's a matter
or fairness: Married people are effectively earning more for doing the same work if health
coverage is provided to their spouses without cost.
And don't worry about costs. Numerous studies have shown that
only a small number of employees accept the benefits (many partners
are covered by their own employers) & the claims made by unmarried partners generally cost less than those filed
by spouses.
Don't permit a hostile environment. Most
people wouldn't think of telling a racist or sexist joke at work. Telling jokes about gays, however, is more often still accepted. It shouldn't be.
If you overhear such a joke, take the employee who told it aside
& make it clear that such humor is unacceptable. Don't allow cartoons
or images that impugn gay men, lesbians or bisexuals to be posted.
And by all means, don't allow any derisive
or hostile remarks to be made to employees known or suspected to be gay. If an employee tells you
about such behavior, investigate promptly & confidentially.
Use inclusive language. If you or the organization is hosting a social event for employees &
their families, be sure that invitations include "partners" or "significant others" & not just spouses. If employees attend
these events w/partners, be sure you introduce yourself & welcome the employee's guest.
If you have policies allowing employees to take time off to
care for an ill spouse (& in many cases the Family Medical Leave
Act mandates that you do) or for bereavement leave, be sure that partners or significant others are covered by the
policy.
An employee who loses a partner of 20 years shouldn't have to
be at work the next day because his partner "didn't count" & it's happened.
Be consistent. If some employees have photos of their spouses or children on their desks, don't
tell gay, lesbian or bisexual employees that photos of their partners aren't allowed. (Yes, it
happens).
If winners of a sales incentive program are sent on a trip to
Hawaii w/ their spouses or significant others, don't tell gay, lesbian & bisexual employees that their partners have to
stay home. If … well, you get the idea.
Hold everyone accountable. You won't tolerate off-color jokes, obscene photos or lewd behavior from straight
employees. Don't tolerate it from gay employees either. Gay people are entitled to equal treatment,
but not special treatment.
Stay
Out of Jail
Don't discriminate. Currently, there is no federal law that prohibits job discrimination
based on sexual orientation. However, such discrimination is illegal in several states & many cities.
Congress has considered federal law barring discrimination based
on sexual orientation & most experts expect it to pass at some point. (Most Americans support
the proposal).
To be prudent, don't make decisions about hiring, promotion,
overseas assignment or other work-related issue based on someone's actual or perceived sexual orientation.
Don't ignore harassment. Harassment law from
any perspective is complicated. However, when it comes to issues related to sexual orientation it gets particularly complex.
There are 2 types of harassment at
issue here:
1. Sexual harassment of an
employee. There are two forms of such harassment: Demanding sexual favors or relations in exchange for promotion,
job security or other work-related actions (known as quid pro quo harassment) or allowing
an environment in which sexually explicit language, humor, images & so on are present (this
can be seen as harassment because some employees feel they're working in a hostile
environment). This kind of harassment is illegal no matter who does the harassing or is harassed; men harassing men
or women harassing women is no more acceptable than men harassing women or vice versa.
2. Harassment based on sexual
orientation. Sometimes employees are harassed based on their sexual orientation. In such cases, the harassment
generally has nothing to do with sexual favors.
Instead, employees are taunted,
humiliated or even physically abused because they are gay, lesbian or bisexual (or perceived to be).
Such harassment is similar to name-calling or threats to African-Americans, Latinos or women because of their race or gender.
Currently, there is no federal law against harassment
based on sexual orientation. However, it's illegal in some states & cities. And it's always bad
business.
The prudent thing is to protect employees from harassment &
promptly investigate any claims.
Bob Rosner is the co-author of The Boss's Survival Guide (McGraw-Hill, 2001), along with Allan Halcrow,
former editor of Workforce Magazine and Alan Levins, senior partner of San Francisco-based employer law firm Littler Mendelson.
Rosner is also founder of the award-winning workingwounded.com. He can be reached via fax at (206) 780-4353, and via e-mail at: bob@workingwounded.com.
Real-Life Example
Gays were frequently the butt of jokes. Disparaging comments were common. No one at the office was "out."
And so the salesperson at the high-tech company
decided not to let anyone know she was a lesbian. "I truly believed that if I came out, I could lose my job," she said. "At
a minimum, I wondered about the territories I would get."
And so she lived in the closet. She never mentioned
the partner she went home to every night - the one offering encouragement, a sympathetic ear about difficult clients & occasionally a shoulder rub. She never
talked about her weekends or holidays. She often had lunch alone.
But professionally she was excelling.
She surpassed sales goals & earned a bigger territory. The promotion required travel & because everyone assumed she
was single, she was asked to travel on weekends. Soon she was among the company's top salespeople. And
the lying began.
Her job performance caught the attention of the
CEO, who invited her to his home for dinner. In a panic, she called a good friend - a gay
man w/a partner of his own & asked him to go w/her as her "date."
After that, her friend was her date for all company
social events. People even began asking when they were going to get married.
Then she won a sales contest. The prize was a
trip to the Caribbean. She took the trip w/ her friend; her partner stayed home. But that trip put a strain on her relationship
& on her friend's home life.
She was the company's top salesperson, producing
more revenue than anyone else, but she quit; the strain had gotten to be too much.
"My boss never knew why I left," she says. "He
still calls once in a while & tries to get me back. I loved that job, but I could never go
back. Life is too short."
Do At Least the Minimum
Don't allow gay, lesbian or bisexual employees
to be treated w/less respect than other employees.
Get More Information
Straight Jobs, Gay Lives: Gay and Lesbian Professionals, The Harvard Business School and the American
Workplace by Annette Friskopp and Sharon Silverstein, Touchstone Books, 1996.
Dismissing People Fairly
- What you really need to know
Most Employment Tribunal claims arise from dismissal
scenarios. There are a range of pitfalls & safeguards of which you need to be aware to negotiate thru this minefield at minimum expense & w/ a high level of security.
This course covers all of these issues including:
Dismissing in accordance w/ the contract; what notice to give; how (& whether) to pay in lieu of notice;
bonuses & share options; breach of contract claims on dismissal & how to avoid them; references – whether to give & what to say!; holiday pay; permanent health insurance & the long-term
absentee employee
Unfair Dismissal
- Misconduct dismissals –
operating a good disciplinary procedure; examples of disciplinary action – drugs, alcohol
& smoking, e-mail & internet abuse; absenteeism
- Capability dismissals –
ill health, poor performance, incompetence
- Business reorganizations
& changing employment conditions – the employee who refuses; taking over a business ("Transfer
of Undertakings")
- Danger areas! Dismissing
pregnant (& other) employees & those w/grievances
- Redundancy – when is
an employee or a position redundant; how to consult & select properly; how to calculate a redundancy payment; managing
redundancies to minimise the pain
Payments on termination of Employment; Compromise Agreements – achieving a fire-proof solution to a termination problem; the advantages
of an agreement; what it needs to say & how to manage the process
Employment Tribunals – what you (& the employee)
can expect if you get it wrong! Dealing w/Employment Tribunal claims;
settling claims.
IF YOU WOULD LIKE THIS COURSE TO BE PRESENTED ON AN IN HOUSE BASIS AT YOUR ORGANISATION SIMPLY CALL
MBL ON 0161 374 4775 OR EMAIL information@mblseminars.com
|
 |
|
How to fight fair
No matter how knowledgeable you are, you're bound to find yourself
in a heated situation that results in an argument. An argument is a condition where at least two communication cycles are incomplete.
The first communication cycle that failed to complete caused an irritation & now the second one causes anger. Now, if both people are angry, you have a fight on your hands.
In any fight, you have a choice:
win at any cost, or resolve the incomplete communication cycles.
Obviously, most people, if the choice were arbitrary, would choose
to complete the missing cycles. People attempt the win at any cost for any of the following 4
reasons:
- Activated past memories are interfering with reality. Activated
past memories can leave a person in a completely reactive state with a feeling of not having any real choice. To deal with this, assume for now that you or they have a real
choice which is only hidden & has yet to present itself. This will temporally free up the reactive situation. This is only a short term fix. (We'll
study the reactive mind shortly, but for now lets learn how to fight fair.)
- You or they feel that the outcome of the fight will determine survival.
To deal with this situation you need to build some trust that survival is not
at stake. Work together to safely direct the energy that is being generated. For example, take
a walk together around the block.
- People will attempt to win at any cost if they feel that someone else is watching that's
more important. Your solution is to arrange to talk to the person in private.
- Winning is important if they don't think they have anything better. This is either a lack of knowledge, or lack of confidence. Television teaches us to be talking heads. Point & Counterpoint, with no time delay for reflection.
Often talking at the same time & projecting through the
non listener to the rolling cameras. To deal with this you must lead by example. Always fight fair
so that it becomes a habit you don't have to think about. Further ask the other person - after the heat of the moment is long gone - if what you do or did was fair to them. Use that discussion to agree to your own set of custom rules unique to the two of you.
What does it mean to fight fair? Isn't the subject a contradiction - an oxymoron? How can someone fight - without being wrong? Yes the other
was right. Yes you too were right.
There exists a misunderstanding between two people. Both people are honest & both were seeking the real truth, but they
have misinformation or a lack of knowledge between them.
It's the state of their relationship. It's not a situation about
absolute knowledge, but a situation about relative knowledge. Knowledge is gathered from experiences & all
of us have a separate path of experience.
People can & often do harbor real issues of
truth & honesty that need to be spoken. Real misunderstanding is much more common than most people think. It comes from our unique individuality & our gift of self awareness.
So what does it mean to fight fair?
First of all, it's just the opposite of fighting to win at any cost.
To win at any cost, you must pile point after point & constantly
keep your opponent off balance by changing the subject. Don't let them interrupt you by insisting on their composure while you speak. After you score enough points,
your opponent will go silent on you.
This means you win. You score a point when your opponent's mouth
drops open, or eyes glaze over, or otherwise loses his or her concentration. People who are good
at winning at any cost are often lawyers.
They, of course, are playing to a jury, even when the jury is missing.
They're just practicing their profession. For them, it's a living, nothing personal. (This
of course is a conversational stereotype, used to make a point about the quality of human interaction. Not all lawyers are
this way.)
If you want people to trust you, you must fight fair. This
isn't easy to learn, since you are sometimes very angry. Fighting fair can be
easy, once you learn, consider the following 6 Lemmas.
- Lemma #1:To fight fair,
allow the subject some time to resolve.
In order to persuade the other person to fight fair, you need to build up trust in
them that you will not pull a bait & switch. You'll leave the subject on the table long enough for him or her to really
finish with it. You must use your judgment to know when you can safely change the subject. If your partner shows concern, back up to the last subject.
- Lemma #2: To fight fair,
speak as if only one person can hear.
If there are 3 people in a conversation, there's a temptation to
face the person who agrees with you & to talk to the person who disagrees. This is a manipulation, that will cause more problems than it solves. If you want the person who disagrees with you,
to trust you,
you must speak to that person, as if the other person, the one who agrees, weren't listening.
- Lemma #3: To fight fair,
act but don't re-act.
To maintain your integrity, you need to base your communications on long-term goals. If you allow yourself to only respond in the moment you'll tend to feed re-stimulated past memories.
Re-stimulated past memories is the domain of the mind, which we will
shortly address & study. Suffice it for now that if you activate the mind, it'll tend to take over. This is especially
true if you react to the mind. This isn't to say that you're not to be responsive to what the other person presents.
You must make your contract real & not phony. At the same time,
you must choose a straight path toward a long-term goal. The person who is automatically reacting feels a lack of freedom & a loss of joy.
If you can't separate them from their reactive mind, you'll make
it more difficult for them to separate from that reactivity & see that they have more choices. Again real understanding
requires your leadership. You won't have it yourself unless you can freely give it away to others.
- Lemma #4: To fight fair, allow
a complete cycle on the other persons issue.
You can act to help the other person gain confidence that the current problem will be resolved. You can do this by paraphrasing in your own words what the
other person is asking you, or what his or her position is.
Further, don't move on until the other person agrees that you understand him or her. What this allows is that you can slip a complete communication cycle, within the existing argument. This builds trust to help calm the panic.
In this process, you're not misrepresenting your position; you're
not manipulating the situation. All you're doing is being a good listener & letting people know they've been heard. The fact of being a good listener will help without being manipulative, since the progress is real & not phony.
- Lemma #5: To fight fair, take ownership
for your feelings.
Rather than tell other people how they're acting or
doing, tell them how you're feeling. Avoid blame structured language & use instead you & your feelings.
This isn't easy & to do this you must avoid unleashing
your anger. If you restrict yourself to what you know about yourself, you will reach them with the real information & they will
not be instantly offended.
Your feelings are a subject that only you are fully qualified to be an expert on. They, on the other hand, may be better qualified
to know their own actions. This isn't an easy approach to communication, since we don't see it on TV.
Television has language that quickly & easy develops plot
lines of blame & are easily resolved by violence. In spite of a general lack of examples, taking personally about your
feelings does work & it works well.
Lemma #6: Use acknowledgment to really mean you understand - not to control the conversation.
Understanding is a truth issue not a control issue. If you don't understand someone, don't lie to them & tell them that you do. They can
feel when you understand & when you don't - so you will only be
lying to yourself.
If you're really listening to them & you don't understand - they won't be offended if you express your confusion & give them a real chance to better explain what they're really saying. It's very harmful to the
quality of a relationship to be saying "yes I understand" only to get control of the conversation.
They know it's a lie & furthermore you're subverting the direction
of the conversation - by inserting incomplete communication cycles. Now you have a lie making things worse.
We have lightly touched on the idea that some functions you need to survive are beyond your direct control. When issues are beyond your direct control you need to negotiate & build your reciprocity with others. There are also times when you might get angry & again feel like things are beyond your control.
To help you negotiate when you're angry, think about the process of fighting fair. To fight fair
is to have good habits, based on long-term goals of real understanding. Both of these processes - reciprocity &
fair fight habits, will help you to gain more confidence & therefore more patience when dealing with other people.
whatza "lemma"?
- A subsidiary proposition assumed to be valid & used to
demonstrate a principal proposition.
- A theme, argument, or subject indicated in a title.
- A word or phrase treated in a glossary or similar listing.
How to Fight Fairly by Stanley J. Gross, Ed.D.
From suburban parks to professional
stadiums, team members follow pre-established rules when playing baseball or football. Boxing has the Marquis of Queensberry
rules that turn what might have been a melee into a sporting event. Precedents, codes, policies & regulations govern courts
of law. Even war has the Geneva Convention!
Soccer, of course, has rules
by which the contestants play, but the grandstands can be quite a different matter. Some European soccer fans disregard the
rules of social order & the result is chaos & rioting. The situation in these soccer grandstands is similar to what
can be found in many families.
Without a structure to help
family members resolve their conflicts, differences often result in arguments (at best) & abuse (at worst). Adopting rules helps to create an orderly way of discussing differences.
Developing Rules of Engagement
“Fair fighting,”
a concept introduced by Dr. George Bach, introduces a set of rules that make reasonable discussion possible. It does this
by prescribing a format that allows the parties to listen to one another as they express their feelings & concerns in a calm & forthright manner. The ultimate goal is for each to understand the other.
The rules of fair fighting:
- Bar physical & verbal abuse
- Disallow offensive labeling of others’ ideas, character,
or behavior
- Exclude assumptions about anothers' thinking or motives (including talking for one another)
- Ban putting the relationship on the line when you're not having
your way in the discussion.
The parties need to agree in advance on a specific set of rules to follow & must establish these rules when calm. The goal is for the discussion to be effective rather than give either party an opportunity to “get
even,” so “drama” is considered counterproductive. When the rules are set, they should be written down so
there is no confusion later.
Here are some ideas to consider
when developing your rules of engagement:
- Decide when:
Identify a good time for your discussion. Avoid times when tired, or when children may be listening, or when stress may be looming. If it's a time when you're both relaxed, it's likely to work better.
- Decide where:
Find a neutral location for your discussion. Avoid discussions in your bed or in locations where you're likely to be interrupted.
- Decide what:
Agree on the topic or the problem for discussion beforehand.
- Limit the discussion to a single topic or problem. Related issues make it too complicated for clarity.
- Focus on the present situation.
Past history can raise the emotional barometer.
- Make a short specific statement
about your concern. Vague & lengthy statements are hard to follow.
- Calmly state
your feelings about the situation. Most feeling words are variations on one of these themes: mad, glad, sad, & scared. Again, if you can’t
name you're feeling calmly, delay the discussion until you can.
- Decide how: Use
active listening skills to move toward the goals of understanding & compromise, as follows:
- The person presenting the concern begins by making a full statement, including content & feelings, without interruption.
- The second person restates his or her understanding
of the first person’s statement, without interruption.
- The first person either agrees that the second person adequately
restated the concern or clarifies the part that was not understood.
- If necessary, the second person restates the part that was
clarified.
- When the first person finally agrees that the second person
understands, the second person has the opportunity to respond.
- The first person restates until the second person is satisfied that the first person understands.
- This active listening process continues until both parties are satisfied that they understand each
other.
- When each truly understands the
other’s concerns & feelings, it's likely that some options or middle ground will emerge that both parties “can live with.” The art of compromise
is facilitated by the idea that each party gets some of what he or she wants, but not all.
- When a rule is violated, complain
about the violation. If it isn't immediately resolved, declare a time-out. Agree on a visual or
verbal sign as a time-out signal. Use healthy strategies (taking a walk, meditating, moderate
exercise) to calm down. Reschedule for a time when both parties have calmed down.
T - Thinking
50%
of population. Needs to know "who, when, where, why & how." Objective. Don't show emotion readily & are often uncomfortable dealing with people's feelings. May hurt people's feelings without knowing it.
Like
analysis & putting things into logical order. Can get along without harmony. Tend to
decide impersonally, sometimes paying insufficient attention to people's
wishes. Need to be treated fairly. Are able to reprimand people or fire them when necessary. Are more analytically oriented - respond more easily to people's thoughts. Tend to be firm-minded.
Need Feeling types to: persuade, concilate, forecast how others will feel, arouse enthusiasm, teach, sell, advertise, appreciate the thinker.
You
probably:
-
Are able to stay cool, calm & objective in situations when everyone else is upset.
-
Would rather settle a dispute based
on what is fair & truthful rather than what will make people
happy.
-
Enjoy
proving a point for the sake of clarity; it's not beyond you to argue both sides in a discussion simply to expand your intellectual horizons.
-
Are more firm-minded
than gentle-hearted; if you disagree with people, you would rather tell them than say nothing & let them think they're right.
-
Pride yourself on your objectivity despite the fact that some people accuse you of being
cold & uncaring (you know this couldn't be farther
from the truth)
-
Don't mind making difficult decisions
& can't understand why so may people get upset
about things that aren't related to the issue at hand.
-
Think it's more important to be right than liked; you don't believe it's necessary to like people in order to be able to work with them & do a good job.
-
Are impressed with & lend more
credence to things that are logical & scientific; until you receive more information to justify Type
watching's benefits, you are skeptical about what it can do.
-
Remember numbers
& figures more readily than faces & names.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|